About This Site

Story Ending Never is a read-only blog and site. There are a number of reasons for this status.

Before I get into that, I’ll just point you to what (at this point in my writing) I feel is my flagship post. It is short. It is to the point. It is a call-to-arms of sorts. It names the problem and defines what I want to see and what I think we all need.

‘Out There’ Women

But back to my read-only status:

First, at this point in time, the author is not interested moderating and filtering discussion or receiving feedback other than that of the numerical variety, which can be provided through the blessedly silent statistics mechanism. I understand well that this automatically makes my site less read, but that is a-okay for me. How often do women have choices about their exposure to the male voice and agenda?

Second, at this point in time, the author does not feel discussion is possible with those of the liberal, post-modern persuasion. It is an unthinking orientation where words and ideas mean nothing, except when it is to the speaker’s advantage to apply meaning. It is a decidedly pro-cock and anti-woman way of being. These folks are easily identifiable through their use of vague and silencing words and terms such as:

  • balanced viewpoint
  • equality
  • inclusiveness
  • diversity
  • cultural sensitivity
  • identify as…
  • positive thinking
  • ‘men suffer, toooo!’ and the companion whine, ‘women do bad things, toooo!’
  • ‘I don’t believe in violent solutions to misogyny’
  • ‘I’m not a feminist, but…’
  • ‘I don’t hate men’
  • ‘privileged white woman’
  • men can be feminists, too
  • ‘Who am I to judge…?’ (unless it is evil radical feminists, whom I can judge harshly)
  • trans-women are women, too
  • gender fluidity
  • ‘my pronoun of choice is…’

Third, at this point in time, the author does not wish to engage with Patriarchy’s cockpuppets (religious handmaidens or liberal, ‘sex positive’ fun-feminists) – those women who:

a) will defend Patriarchy to the death because it’s easier than fighting it, and/or

b) are prone to using the po-mo lexicon outlined above,

c) hate rad-feminists cuz we’re ruining all the empowerfulness, choosey-choiceness, fun or sexayness of female slavery (aka marriage / forced breeding / pole-dancing / burlesque / porn / prostitution / rape fantasies / dick-sucking / PIV / anal sex / BDSM, and/or

d) allow their special relationships with totally awesome, can-do-no-wrong hubbies, boyfriends, and sons to prevent them from seeing what they’re swimming in daily and from believing that men are fundamentally, biologically wired for violence, and have created a system of socialization that rewards them for that violence.

Fourth, at this point in time, the author does not wish to engage with the trans, MtT in particular, who are destroying any hope of the survival and safety for women in the West through insisting, usually violently, that 1 + 1 = 3, sex = gender, and penises are female. MtTs are usually mentally ill, misogynist, rape-apologist, and sometimes autogynephilic MEN who, instead of getting the help they need to deal with their fetishes, dysmorphia and narcissism, decide to cling to harmful gender parodies in order to get off and often, to victimize lesbians (especially) and women (in general). It is dangerous to engage with trannies as they are violent, deluded men of all races who specialize in the violent silencing of women who are legitimately frightened of the further erosion of the few rights and little privacy they have. Note that there is no judgment of mental illness here, but at the same time, it absolutely cannot be used as an excuse to abuse and violate women. These men must take responsibility for their issues.

Fifth, at this point in time, the author does not wish to engage with religious people who are some of the most dangerous woman-haters on the planet, and who will defend to the death a) misogyny, b) irrational thought, c) violence against women, d) control of women’s bodies, and e) unequal access to freedom of speech, protection, healthcare, etc.

Sixth, at this point in time, the author does not wish to engage with atheist men who are some of the most dangerous woman-haters on the planet, and who use mostly evo-psych, non-science arguments to defend to the death a) misogyny, b) irrational thought, c) violence against women, d) control of women’s bodies, and e) unequal access to freedom of speech, protection, healthcare, etc.

Seventh, all female writers writing on the topic of feminism have one thing in common (at least): they are the target of religious and atheist, gay and straight, male threats and abuse as well as tedious, endless mansplaining by men with reading comprehension problems, willful ignorance, and a shit-ton of sex-based privilege.  Many of these men try to put on the mantle of ‘male feminist’, but they are really wolves in women’s clothing (along with MtTs and liberal ‘feminists’) and possess all the hatred of women that every other group of men and most women have. The threats and verbal abuse are often delivered under the heading of “You b****** have all the power. Men are the victims!!!” and can include threats of rape, torture, killing, and other violence, as well as horrific sex-specific denigrating comments (hate speech). The mansplaining is the tedious and ubiquitous need for all men to put their two cents into every fucking thing they encounter, regardless of knowledge, experience, age, culture, intelligence, education, and coherence. Suffice it to say, read-only status will serve here to save the author from exposure to pure, unadulterated filth, to preserve her limited sanity, and to reinforce the needed policy and practice that males should really learn to listen, read, and keep their yaps shut. Note that some abuse comes from women who act as cockpuppets or fembots, but the scary and to-be-taken-seriously threats come from men of all political and social leanings and races, and MtTs (who are men regardless of what they are wearing).

Eighth, whether you are talking to religious misogynists or [insert other group affiliation here] misogynists, one thing is true – they argue from a point of privilege and related willful ignorance, not logic or evidence, and they uphold oppressive practices to maintain that privilege. Female human rights, freedom from males, and equal access to safety and resources – the core tenets of radical feminism – are not debatable things. Thus, there is no alternate perspective to the radical feminist core belief (that women should be free from sex-based oppression) that is morally or logically correct. Debate doesn’t need to happen between oppressors and oppressed, and only serves to derail the latter and deplete their energy stores and time. No other oppressed group on the planet is forced to live among their oppressors or is pressured to accept them and negotiate with them. Why must women? Other bloggers do allow a certain degree of cretinism on their sites (for humour, learning points, and a general belief that even the staunchest of misogynists can learn, which of course, they can’t or, rather, won’t), but that is not happening here.

In short, the author is writing for herself primarily, and secondarily, anyone who likes to/needs to read about reality in silence without violence and intimidation. I was never allowed to have opinions or emotions or a voice for my negative experiences growing up, or even through adulthood. This is my space to finally express myself without being censored/silenced.

By the time women are able to speak, write and live in safety from the men (and women) who hate us, we won’t actually need this thing called feminism anymore. Dominance structures (male creations) will no longer be in place. By the time atheists, especially female ones, are able to speak, write and live in safety from religious people, we won’t need to have the term ‘atheist’ anymore as religion won’t be around in a significant or dangerous way.

Happy reading.

%d bloggers like this: